Legal Opinion

Fesler v. Brayton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1896No. 17,894PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

— The appellee sued the appellants in the superior court, to enjoin them from proceeding to hold the election in November for. members of the next general assembly, under the provisions of the apportionment act, approved March 6, 1885. It was alleged that the appellants, being the clerk of the circuit court, the auditor, and the sheriff of Marion county, Indiana, were threatening to give notice and proceed to an election under said act, which act, it was alleged, is unconstitutional for the same reasons that the apportionment acts of 1879, 1891, 1893, and 1895 were adjudged by this court to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Denney v. State ex rel. BaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Henderson v. State ex rel. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Rumsey v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. State ex rel. Law v. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Brown v. State Election Board of the OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Parshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API