Legal Opinion

Newell v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1910No. 8590PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King-county, Main, J., entered June 80, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to vacate a tax deed and to. quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On July 12, 1900, the respondent R. H.. Young procured a certificate of delinquency for unpaid taxes; levied in 1896 on certain real property situated in King-county. He thereupon paid the taxes for the subsequent years, and on August 21, 1900, began an action to foreclose-the lien of the certificate. The action was prosecuted to-judgment and sale, at which sale Young became the purchaser, receiving a treasurer’s tax deed for the property on. September 2, 1904. The property in question was formerly owned by the Moore Land Company, a corporation, and was-assessed in its name during the period…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Flueck v. PedigoWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spokane Merchants' Ass'n v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Barker v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Globe Construction Co. v. YostWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kelley v. SakaiWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Boylan v. BockWashington Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API