Legal Opinion

Boylan v. Bock

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1910No. 8888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Shackleford, J., entered September 24, 1909, in favor of the defendants, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing -an action to vacate a tax judgment and deed.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 31st day of July, 1901, judgment was entered in the court below in a tax proceeding entitled Abby Bock v. Barbara Sanders and C. Paul Sanders, foreclosing a delinquency certificate, and directing a sale of the property therein described. On the 5th day of November, 1906, the plaintiff in this action interposed a motion to vacate the tax judgment, in the name and on behalf of the defendants therein, on the ground and for the reason that nO' notice or summons was served on the defendants, and that the court was without jurisdiction to render or enter the tax judgment. This motion was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCord v. McCordWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chezum v. ClaypoolWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Meisenheimer v. MeisenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Flueck v. PedigoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Pierce County v. BunchWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Michelin Tire Co. v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Green v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stolze v. StolzeWashington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API