Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Sakai

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1913No. 10802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered May 25, 1912, dismissing an action to vacate a judgment, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action to pro-, cure a decree setting aside a judgment rendered against him in the superior court for King county, upon the ground that the judgment was rendered without any service of summons upon him. The trial court denied the relief prayed for and dismissed the action, being of the opinion that the validity of the judgment had been finally adjudicated against the contentions of the plaintiff, in former proceedings prosecuted1 by him in the superior court for King county, wherein he sought to have it set aside. The plaintiff has appealed.

The controlling facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCord v. McCordWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chezum v. ClaypoolWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Meisenheimer v. MeisenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Flueck v. PedigoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Sakai v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spokane Merchants' Ass'n v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Barker v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. King v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Architectural Decorating Co. v. NicklasonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Siegley v. NakataWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API