Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Eastham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 393PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Errar from Goal Gounty Court j B. H. Wells, Judge. Action by Dalphus Eastham and others against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

This action was begun on June 25, 1908, by R. M. Eastham, as plaintiff, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, as defehdant, in the county court of Coal county, Okla. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and the defendant appealed the case to this court. While pending here, suggestion of the death of the plaintiff was made, and by stipulation the case is revived by Dalphus Eastham and Arthur Eastham, as the sole and only heirs at law of R. M. Eastham, deceased. In the petition filed by the said decedent, it' was alleged, in substance, that plaintiff was the owner of lot…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Williams v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Smith v. Rawlings' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Brunson v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Nation v. SavelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API