Legal Opinion
in the Interest of M.H., S.H., and G.H., Children
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided May 5, 2010No. 10-08-00308-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
The mother and the maternal grandparents of the children the subject of this suit bring this appeal from a decree terminating the mother’s parental rights, designating the father of S.H. as her managing conservator, and designating the Department of Family and Protective Services as the managing conservator of the other two children. The grandparents contend that the court erred by: (1) failing to exclude the testimony of the Department’s expert witnesses for failure to properly designate the experts and disclose their mental impressions and opinions before trial…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In the Interest of A.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Jeffrey May v. Ticor Title Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Pamela A. Beinar v. Michael J. Deegan, Elizabeth F. Deegan, and Glen Lakes Homeowners' Association, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Epps v. DeboiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Efstratios Pistikopoulos v. Texas A&M University and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.