Legal Opinion

Efstratios Pistikopoulos v. Texas A&M University and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided March 1, 2017No. 10-16-00327-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00327-CV EFSTRATIOS PISTIKOPOULOS, Appellant v. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AND KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellees From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-000526-CV-361 MEMORANDUM OPINION In one issue, appellant, Efstratios Pistikopoulos, argues that the trial court improperly granted a plea to the jurisdiction in favor of appellees, Texas A&M University and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, which allowed appellees to assert sovereign immunity for an alleged ultra-vires action. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND This…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API