Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Neave Township Board of Zoning Appeals

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2002No. C.A. Case No. 1579, T.C. Case No. 01-CV-59073PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

{¶ 1} This ease is before us on the appeal of the Neave Township Board of Appeals (“board”) from a trial court judgment reversing the board’s decision to deny a conditional use application. As a single assignment of error, the board claims that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that appellee, Mark Wooten, did not operate a business or home occupation at his residence.

{¶ 2} After considering the record and applicable law, we find the assignment of error to be without merit. Consequently, the trial court judgment will be affirmed. •

I

{¶ 3} As is evident, this case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Smith v. Granville Township Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Trent v. German Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Houghtaling v. City of Medina Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brunswick Hills Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. LudroskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API