Wooten v. Neave Township Board of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
{¶ 1} This ease is before us on the appeal of the Neave Township Board of Appeals (“board”) from a trial court judgment reversing the board’s decision to deny a conditional use application. As a single assignment of error, the board claims that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that appellee, Mark Wooten, did not operate a business or home occupation at his residence.
{¶ 2} After considering the record and applicable law, we find the assignment of error to be without merit. Consequently, the trial court judgment will be affirmed. •
I
{¶ 3} As is evident, this case…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. Granville Township Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Trent v. German Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Houghtaling v. City of Medina Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brunswick Hills Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. LudroskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012