Houghtaling v. City of Medina Board of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Batchelder, Judge.
Appellant, the Medina City Board of Zoning Appeals appeals from the judgment of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas reversing the board’s decision finding that appellees James and Victoria Houghtaling were in violation of the Medina City Zoning Code. We affirm.
I
The Houghtalings are the owners of a travel business known as “Pleasure Cruises.” Pleasure Cruises acts like a travel agency, booking its clients on cruise ship vacations. The Houghtalings run this business out of their home on East Liberty Street in the city of Medina, Ohio. The business is permissible as a “home…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. Granville Township Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Ohio Department of Health v. SowaldOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Woods v. Civil Service CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wooten v. Neave Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2002