Legal Opinion

Rinkevich v. Coeling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1955No. Docket 50, Calendar 46,527PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

(for reversal). The parties to this action were residents of the city of Grandville, Kent county, Michigan. Plaintiff’s decedent, Peter Rinkevich, was its chief of police. We shall refer to decedent as plaintiff, to defendant Russell Coeling as defendant, and the latter’s employer, Empire Lumber Company, a Michigan corporation, as codefendant. The company’s principal office was located in Grand-ville and defendant solicited orders for it in neighboring cities and villages. Defendant was the sole owner •of a 2-door Lincoln automobile which he used when -on business for the codefendant who…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Bobich v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Willett v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Eskovitz v. BergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tien v. BarkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Washington v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Coon v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. McKenzie v. McKenzieMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Vanderah v. OlahMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API