United States v. Kelly
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Patrick Kelly (“Kelly”) has moved for (i) an order dismissing the indictment for failure to provide a sufficient statement of the facts constituting the offense charged, pursuant to Rule 7(c)(1), and for violating the First Amendment; (ii) alternatively, an order requiring the Government to provide Kelly with a bill of particulars; (iii) specification of bad acts evidence by the Government at least thirty days before trial, pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 403 & 404(b) and Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(d)(2), and granting of a hearing on the admissibility of such evidence;…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Nick StavroulakisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. TrippeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. CarmichaelDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- United States v. CasseseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. VilarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.