Legal Opinion
United States v. Cassese
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 23, 2003No. 03 Cr. 302 (RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant John J. Cassese (“Cassese”) moves to: (1) suppress certain statements he made during the course of plea negotiations pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(f) and Federal Rule of Evidence 410; and (2) dismiss Count Two of the Indictment as legally insufficient. For the reasons stated below, this motion is granted in part.
Prior Proceedings
Indictment, 03 Cr. 302(RWS) (“Ind.”), was filed on March 12, 2002 in two counts. Count One charges Cassese with securities fraud in connection with a tender offer, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78n(e) and 78ff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Robert ChestmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ruben Alfonso and Feli GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- United States v. John J. CasseseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Nasso v. Bio Reference Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. KornmanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TalbotDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.