Legal Opinion

United States v. Vilar

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 17, 2008No. 05 Crim. 0621(RJS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Defendants Alberto William Vilar (“Vi-lar”) and Gary Alan Tanaka (“Tanaka”) are charged with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, as well as substantive counts alleging securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. The parties to this action now seek a finding as to whether the Government may offer at trial certain documents recovered from the New York office of Amerindo Investment Advisors Inc. (“Amerindo”), of which Defendants were co-founders and two of its shareholders, officers, and…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. VilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. In re State ex rel. SkurkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. United States v. BarretDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  4. United States v. AhmedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. United States v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API