Legal Opinion

Grannis v. Schroder

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 5, 1997No. 96-CA-2240-MRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHRODER, Judge:

This is a planning and zoning case which discusses the agricultural supremacy clause of KRS 100.203(4); what is an agricultural use; and the differences between a nonconforming use and a nonconforming structure.

The appellee, Charlie Schroder, a/k/a Charles J. Schroder (“Schroder”), owns about 80 acres in unincorporated Harrison County, approximately 2.8 miles north of Cynthiana on U.S. 27. His house is located up on a ridge with a barn down near the highway. The appellants, Sid Grannis and Loretta Grannis, live across the street from the barn. On November 13, 1995,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Selligman v. Von Allmen Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Goodrich v. SelligmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. Danville-Boyle County Planning & Zoning Commission v. PrallKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  5. A. L. Carrithers & Son v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nash v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kentucky Public Service Commission v. ShadoanKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kentucky Public Service Commission v. ShadoanKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Nash v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Newcomb v. GrossDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API