Grannis v. Schroder
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHRODER, Judge:
This is a planning and zoning case which discusses the agricultural supremacy clause of KRS 100.203(4); what is an agricultural use; and the differences between a nonconforming use and a nonconforming structure.
The appellee, Charlie Schroder, a/k/a Charles J. Schroder (“Schroder”), owns about 80 acres in unincorporated Harrison County, approximately 2.8 miles north of Cynthiana on U.S. 27. His house is located up on a ridge with a barn down near the highway. The appellants, Sid Grannis and Loretta Grannis, live across the street from the barn. On November 13, 1995,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Selligman v. Von Allmen Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Goodrich v. SelligmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Danville-Boyle County Planning & Zoning Commission v. PrallKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- A. L. Carrithers & Son v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nash v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Kentucky Public Service Commission v. ShadoanKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Kentucky Public Service Commission v. ShadoanKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Nash v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Newcomb v. GrossDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023