Legal Opinion
Danville-Boyle County Planning & Zoning Commission v. Prall
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1992No. 91-SC-782-DGPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
This zoning case requires a definitive expression of this Court’s views concerning basic requirements to be observed in the procedure of amending a Planned Unit Development.
Respondents, Thomas and Edna Prall, sought to have their agriculturally zoned property (11.03 acres) changed into the following classifications. The respondents requested that 9.06 acres be rezoned R-l (low density residential) and the remaining 1.97 acres be rezoned C-2 (neighborhood commercial). The tracts, while separated by a creek, adjoined one another with the latter tract containing highway…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- City of Louisville v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Lee v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Bellemeade Company v. PriddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Kentucky, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. County of BooneKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Warren County Citizens v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
- Fritz v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.