Legal Opinion

Nash v. Campbell County Fiscal Court

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2011No. 2009-SC-000152-DGPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice SCHRODER.

The appeals in the Court of Appeals were consolidated and an opinion was issued which revisits the “agricultural supremacy clause,” the exemption of certain agricultural land from zoning and subdivision regulations under Chapter 100 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes. We accepted discretionary review to give some guidance in applying the agricultural exemption to both the use and the division of land.

I. INTRODUCTION

Paul and Pat Nash (Nash) own about twenty-eight acres in Campbell County. Clifford and Toby Torline (Torline) own about thirty-five acres in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pearson Ex Rel. Trent v. National Feeding Systems, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cole v. GilvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  4. Sarver v. County of Allen Ex Rel. Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sebastian-Voor Properties, LLC v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Walker v. BlairKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Tax Ease Lien Investments 1, LLC v. Commonwealth Bank & TrustKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. William David Ellington v. Harlan Randall BecraftKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Kentucky Properties Holding LLC v. SproulKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Asa Pieratt Gullett IV v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API