Legal Opinion
Titlebaum v. Loblaws, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1978No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Memorandum: This products liability action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs when a bottle of cola exploded. The defendants are Loblaws, Inc., the retailer from whom the product was purchased, Anchor Hocking Corp., the manufacturer of the bottle, and Custom Beverage Packers, the bottler of the cola. Three theories of liability were alleged against Loblaws and Anchor Hocking: breach of implied warranty of merchantability, negligence, and strict…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- DiGrazia v. CastronovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Noga v. Monroe Medi-TransAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Huling v. CoppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Held v. 7-Eleven Food StoreNew York Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.