DiGrazia v. Castronova
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGoldman, J.
In this personal injury action based on a dog bite incurred by the infant plaintiff, the jury returned a verdict of no cause for action in favor of defendants-respondents Castronova, owners of the dog. The six-year-old infant Christopher DiGrazia (Christopher) and his father, Philip DiGrazia, appeal on the grounds that their motion for a directed verdict should have been granted, that the verdict *250was against the weight of the evidence and that the court erred in its charge, particularly the instruction concerning contributory negligence and the denial of a requested instruction concerning the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. SandgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Miles v. R & M Appliance Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Guaspari v. GorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hahnke v. . FriederichNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Dance v. Town of SouthamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Lynch v. NacewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Waldman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Matthew H. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Bjelicic v. Lynned Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.