Legal Opinion
Held v. 7-Eleven Food Store
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Samuel L. Green, J.
Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ causes of action in strict products liability and breach of warranty. The underlying action seeks damages for personal injuries sustained on February 28, 1977 when plaintiff William T. Held fell in an allegedly defective hole located in a raised concrete walkway directly in front of the door to a 7-Eleven store franchised by defendant Southland Corporation to defendant 7-Eleven Food Store.
A search of the entire record in this case (CPLR 3212, subd [b]) discloses that as a result of severe…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pearl Investments, LLC v. Standard I/O, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Stouffer Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1982