Legal Opinion

Sapero v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 12, 2007No. 72, Sept. Term, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCathell, J.

We are presented in this case, yet again, with litigation stemming from the City of Baltimore’s use of quick-take condemnation. Specifically, this case arises out of an attempt by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (“the City”), appellee, to condemn several private properties via quick-take. 1 The properties in question, owned by Robert A. Sape ro, 2 appellant, are located at 1701-1709 North Charles Street (commonly referred to as the “Chesapeake Restaurant”) and 22-24 East Lanvale Street, both located in Baltimore City, Maryland (collectively referred to as “the Properties”). On…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pizza di Joey v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Lupfer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. United States v. 480.00 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. In the Matter of Hon. Pamela J. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Makowski v. Mayor and City of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API