United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FORRESTER, District Judge:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order confirming and approving a September 15, 2005 Land Commission Report setting the compensation that the United States must pay Appellants to take their property by eminent domain. Appellants contend that (1) the district court adopted the wrong legal standard to determine whether the Government improperly used a local zoning ordinance to prevent development on and reduce the value of their land; (2) the district court improperly excluded evidence of the Government’s efforts to depress their land values from being presented…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. The Meadow Brook ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Land, Cullman CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. 8.929 Acres of Land in Arlington County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement & Right-of-Way Over 6.09 Acres of LandDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
- Redus Florida Commercial, LLC v. College Station Retail Center, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. 269 Acres Located in BeaufortCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.