Legal Opinion
MacSuga v. Moreno
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 11, 2003No. 89,432PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHargrave, J.
T1 Appeal arising from Court of Civil Appeals de novo review of a Workers' Compensation Court finding of jurisdiction in a case finding the existence of an employment contract.
SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
12 Edward Macsuga owned an automobile garage from which he operated a number of taxi cabs. Macsuga's house was attached to the shop. Moreno, the claimant, and at least one other man lived at Macsuga's house rent-free, in exchange for doing odd jobs from time to time. Moreno was free to come and go at his leisure and did not punch a time clock, did not wear a uniform, did not have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Jones v. University of Central OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Brewer v. Bama Pie, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Beall v. Altus Public School DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Landrum v. OwnbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scarlett v. Air Methods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Visteon Corp. v. YazelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Jarboe Sales Co. v. RowlandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Visteon Corp. v. YazelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Visteon Corp. v. YazelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004