United States v. Maurice Schurr, United States of America v. Harry Rosetsky
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This criminal appeal is before us for the second time. In our previous disposition we affirmed the conviction of the defendants for substantive violations of 29 U.S.C. § 186 (labor representatives’ acceptance of payments from employers) and for conspiracy to violate that statute. We held that although there had been some variances in the Government’s case between indictment and proof, the variances did not warrant reversal because they were not material and prejudicial. United States v. Schurr, 775 F.2d 549 (3d Cir.1985).
We subsequently granted panel…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States Gypsum Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Gary L. DolanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ralph A. Anderskow, United States of America v. Donald AnchorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Susan Frank and Jane Frank KreschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Tony R. Jake, A/K/A SmileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.