Legal Opinion

United States v. Maurice Schurr, United States of America v. Harry Rosetsky

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 10, 1986No. 84-1404, 84-1405PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

This criminal appeal is before us for the second time. In our previous disposition we affirmed the conviction of the defendants for substantive violations of 29 U.S.C. § 186 (labor representatives’ acceptance of payments from employers) and for conspiracy to violate that statute. We held that although there had been some variances in the Government’s case between indictment and proof, the variances did not warrant reversal because they were not material and prejudicial. United States v. Schurr, 775 F.2d 549 (3d Cir.1985).

We subsequently granted panel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary L. DolanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Ralph A. Anderskow, United States of America v. Donald AnchorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Susan Frank and Jane Frank KreschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Tony R. Jake, A/K/A SmileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API