Legal Opinion

Motz v. Jammaron

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1984No. 82CA0466PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BABCOCK, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action arising out of a lease agreement between plaintiffs, Howard U. Motz and Zemlock & Son, Inc., (lessees) and defendant, Joe Jam-maron (lessor). Lessees, while in possession of the leased premises, sought a declaration from the trial court that the lease was valid and enforceable. Lessor denied the existence of the lease alleging that he had terminated the lease upon lessees’ material breach of conditions of the agreement, and he counterclaimed for possession of the premises, alleging termination of the lease and service of the appropriate…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kaitz v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Miller v. Carnation CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carder, Inc. v. CashColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Snow Basin, Ltd. v. Boettcher & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. United Bank of Lakewood National Ass'n v. One Center Joint VentureColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc. v. SittnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People ex rel. E.H.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API