Legal Opinion

Keenly v. McCarty

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, E. N., J.

The defendant is the owner of premises known as No. 1913 James street, in the city of Syracuse, N. Y., and the plaintiffs are owners of premises adjoining the premises of the defendant. The premises involved herein are within what is known as Class A residential district under the Zoning Ordinance of the city, which in general prohibits the use of premises within the district for business purposes. This Zoning Ordinance went into effect in or about January, 1922.

Prior to January, 1922, and for a number of years subsequent *525thereto, the premises now owned by the defendant were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Mayor of Hudson v. ThorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  3. Village of New Rochelle v. LangNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Andrews v. PerryNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Whitridge v. ParkNew York Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Welton v. 40 East Oak St. Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Feldman v. HeschCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  3. Sams v. DemaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Shegda v. Village of LancasterNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. HeinNew York Justice Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API