Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Perry
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
Plaintiffs and defendants Perry are neighbors, living side by side on Arlington avenue in the city of Syracuse. Several years ago Mr. Perry, with the consent of his wife Minnie Perry, constructed near the sidewalk on the latter’s property, a small one-story refreshment booth, known in modern parlance as a " hot dog ” stand, where he has since dispensed “ hot dogs,” ice cream cones, candy, pop corn, cracker jack, soft drinks, and other viands.
The plaintiffs seriously object to this stand, and allege that its operation causes them much annoyance and discomfort, and materially interferes with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Francis v. . SchoellkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Fish v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- O'HAGEN v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Town of Preble v. Song Mountain, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Peters v. MosesNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Jacobs v. GerechtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Keenly v. McCartyNew York Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.