Legal Opinion

In RE PALMER v. Cranor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1954No. 32894PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an original petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner, Robert H. Palmer.

Paragraph IV of the petition alleges that;

“The petitioner in said proceeding was (1) denied due process of law in violation of his rights under the constitutions of the State of Washington and of the Unted [sic] States of America in that he was coerced in entering a plea of guilty thereto (2) when in fact he was innocent, and (3) when if not coerced he would never have entered a plea of guilty, (4) was convicted of a crime which he did not in fact commit, or (5) which had not in fact been comited…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Waley v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. In Re GrieveWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Thorne v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In Re TowneWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. In Re HornerWashington Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of RunyanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In RE WOODS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Application of ParhamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API