Legal Opinion

United States v. Robinson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 3, 1924No. 2225PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaND, Judge

Goods entered by appellees under the tariff act of 1913 were appraised at 15 per cent above their entered value by the appraiser who returned the invoice on May 3, 1920. Appellees attempted to appeal by filing supplementary notice of appeal to reappraisement on May 7, and on May 10 paid $1 to the collector, who received it and treated the appeal as completed. The single general appraiser on reappraisement sustained the entered value. The collector took an appeal to re-reappraisement where the reappraised or entered value was affirmed. The collector, in the final liquidation of the entry,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Edmonson v. BloomshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Stevens v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lonza, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Austin Chemical Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Austin Chemical Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. General Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API