Legal Opinion
Schosboek v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 1937No. 26073. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Holcomb, J.
— On petition for rehearing, respondent urges the decision in Schosboek v. Chicago, M., St. P. & Pac. R. Co., 188 Wash. 672, 63 P. (2d) 477, 90 A. L. R. 846, should be modified for the following reasons: (1) It did not take cognizance of respondent’s contention as to the unconstitutionality and invalidity of chapter 28 of the Laws of 1917, p. 76, because of defectiveness in the title, and of which Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7693 [P. C. § 3486] (Laws 1917, chapter 28, § 19, p. 96), is a part. (2) Respondent is entitled to an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Cott v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Lee v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. First Sec. Bank of Utah, N.A. United States v. Allen. United States v. Cota (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Stack v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Southern Railway Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Taylor v. Lumaghi Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Lessee v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.