Legal Opinion
Fancee Free Mfg. Co. v. Fancy Free Fashions, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 4, 1957PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is an action seeking an injunction, accounting and counsel fees, for alleged infringement by the defendant of the trade name and trade-mark of the plaintiff. Jurisdiction arises because of diversity of citizenship and also is claimed under § 39 of The Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1121.
The Court finds the following facts:
1. The plaintiff is a Missouri corporation organized and doing business under the name of “Fancee Free Mfg. Co.” It uses the trade name “Fancee Free” on items of merchandise manufactured and sold by it. Plaintiff corporation succeeded to the business…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Exquisite Form Indus., Inc. v. Exquisite Fabrics of LondonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Speedry Products, Inc. v. Dri Mark Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Superior Coal Co. v. Ruhrkohle A.G.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.