Ohlquest v. Farwell & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. A motion by defendant Becker to vacate and set aside a judgment in this case against him, as well as the other defendants, was, by order of the district court, overruled. From that order he now appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The facts involved in this case are as follows: J. Y. Farwell & Co., G-. Becker, and another fq-m, brought actions by attachment in the district court of Jones *232county against A. & P. Ohlquest. Two other actions by other firms were brought1 in the same coui’t by attachment against Ohlquest Bros. The defendants in all of these actions were the same. They were doing business under the firm name of Ohlquest Bros., in both Jones and Linn counties. Writs of attachment were issued in the cases to the sheriffs of Jones and Linn counties, and levied upon separate stocks of goods found in each…
2Cited by31 opinions
- Stone v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Kwentsky v. SirovySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Brown v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- State v. CraneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.