Legal Opinion

Croll v. Moorman

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1922No. L. A. No. 7142PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an appeal from an order admitting to probate a will of the decedent dated March 2, 1918, after the granting of a motion for nonsuit at the close of the testimony in a will contest instituted by the appellant Emily Unger Croll, a daughter of decedent, upon the ground that the will was procured by the undue influence of Charles W. Unger, a son of the decedent, and Prances Moorman, a daughter of the decedent. The only question involved in the appeal is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to have sustained a verdict of the jury that the will was procured by undue influence if such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Estate of WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Stieglitz v. SettleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. LuckenbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Camperi v. ChiechiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Liserany v. OvalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Estate of FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Bemis v. CoombsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API