Croll v. Moorman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This is an appeal from an order admitting to probate a will of the decedent dated March 2, 1918, after the granting of a motion for nonsuit at the close of the testimony in a will contest instituted by the appellant Emily Unger Croll, a daughter of decedent, upon the ground that the will was procured by the undue influence of Charles W. Unger, a son of the decedent, and Prances Moorman, a daughter of the decedent. The only question involved in the appeal is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to have sustained a verdict of the jury that the will was procured by undue influence if such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Estate of WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Stieglitz v. SettleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Luckenbach v. LuckenbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Camperi v. ChiechiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Liserany v. OvalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Estate of FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bemis v. CoombsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946