State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOWLING, Justice, for the Court:
The primary question involved in this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence presented to the jury for it to find that appellant waived the lapse or the forfeiture of appellees’ automobile insurance policy issued by appellant. The cause is appealed from a jury verdict for appellees on that issue and comes from the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County.
Appellant contends that its request for a peremptory instruction at the conclusion of all the evidence should have been granted. Another primary contention by appellant is that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Stonewall L. Ins. Co. v. CookeMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Paramount Fire Ins. v. AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Ins. Co. v. GayMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- DeTemple v. Southern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Armstrong v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011