Legal Opinion

DeTemple v. Southern Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 5, 1987No. 1 CA-CIV 8742PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

This appeal is from summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action in which the trial court found that a liability insurance policy did not provide coverage for an automobile accident due to the insured’s failure to pay a timely renewal premium.

Edward James DeTemple contacted James A. Moll, an insurance agent for Southern Insurance Company [Southern], in March, 1984 to obtain an automobile insurance policy for his newly acquired 1978 Dodge pickup truck. DeTemple paid $88.00 in cash to Moll on March 15, 1984 and later received a copy of the insurance policy which stated…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Van Hulle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AshCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Unruh v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  4. Brown v. Progressive Gulf Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sharp v. Valley Forge Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API