Legal Opinion

Paramount Fire Ins. v. Anderson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1951No. 37907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court in favor of appellees for the sum of $2500 on a fire insurance policy issued to them by appellant upon their dwelling house. Since appellant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in refusing it a requested peremptory instruction it is necessary to briefly review the facts disclosed by the record.

Appellant is represented at Gulfport by B. Havard Insurance Agency, a partnership composed of B. Havard and B. D. Portwood, with full authority to issue policies and execute endorsements therefor. Two ladies were employed to do clerical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lititz Mutual Ins. Co. v. MILLERMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. DelaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mississippi Utilities Co. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bacon v. BaconMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Buffalo Ins. Co. v. BordenMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Casualty Company v. WhiteheadMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance v. DunganMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Davis v. Agents Finance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Dixie Electric Power Ass'n v. HoseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  5. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. HancockMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API