Legal Opinion

Farner v. Cole

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 18, 1989No. 87SC347PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

The petitioners, Betty Farner, Dolores Farner, Donald Farner, Dorothy Farner, Jacqulyn Farner, James Farner, Joseph Farner, Marjorie Farner, Sylvester Farner, William Farner, Leo Younger and Viola Younger (the Farner group), appeal the judgment of the Court of Appeals 749 P.2d 970 affirming the district court’s order granting summary judgment to respondents, Junior A. Cole and Ruby F. Cole (the Coles), in two suits brought by the Coles on a promissory note. The Farner group contends that issues of material fact remain for resolution with regard to certain defenses asserted.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cablevision of Breckenridge, Inc. v. Tannhauser Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Brunswick Corporation v. BriscoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Elm Distributors, Inc. v. Tri-Centennial Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Meredith v. RamsdellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Ruther v. ThomasColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haberl v. BigelowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Bigelow v. NottinghamColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. First National Bank of Tribune v. LohmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Haberl v. BigelowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API