Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1964No. 23974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

This is a proceeding commenced by the City of Kansas City for the condemnation of private property for public use in the construction and maintenance of sanitary sewers. The City is authorized to do this under the provisions of Chapter 6, Charter of Kansas City.

In view of the- errors alleged in the motion for new trial and preserved on ap*196peal we deem it unnecessary to set out the ordinances and pleadings filed. There is no question of sufficiency or jurisdiction.

Appellants Alice F., Bessie E., Renick A. and Tracy A. Thomson are the owners of an approximately 23 acre…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vorhof-Duenke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. Kansas City v. Jones Store Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BaumhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. State v. McCannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Kansas City v. ConeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Thomson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Kansas City, Clay County v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. SuarezDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API