Legal Opinion

Kansas City v. Cone

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1968No. 24734PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

This is a proceeding in condemnation instituted by appellant, Kansas City, Missouri, under authority of Article VI of its constitutional charter,1 whereby it acquired permanent sewer rights-of-way and temporary construction easements in and upon lands belonging to various landowners, including respondent condemnees Carl R. Cone and Lucille G. Cone, his wife, to be used in connection with the location, construction and maintenance of a public sewer included in the city’s pollution control project designated “Line Creek Interceptor Sewer.”

In accordance with procedure prescribed by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Michler v. Krey Packing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vorhof-Duenke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Lampe v. Franklin American Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Wilson v. MurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Morton v. HeidornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bueche v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. Monger v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. City of Gladstone v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Kansas City, Clay County v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Bueche v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API