Legal Opinion
United States v. Suarez
District Court, D. Guam
Decided February 1, 1994No. CR 92-036 AWTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TASHIMA, District Judge, sitting by designation.
Defendant was convicted, after trial by jury, of a violation of the Clean Water Act, for having illegally discharged fill material into wetlands without a permit. 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1319(c)(2)(A). He has now moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his conviction and sentence. 1 2 The motion has heretofore been briefed and submitted for decision. Neither party contends that an evidentiary hearing is needed to resolve any matter in issue on the motion.
Defendant makes only a single contention on this motion — that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jonah Iaea v. Franklin Sunn, Director of the Department of Social Services, State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Willie D. Armstead v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Armstead v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994