Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1982No. 15965-SAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

This is a special action brought by the State of Arizona from a decision by the City of Phoenix Municipal Court which ordered a police officer to appear, testify and fully cooperate in an oral deposition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 8, Arizona Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.

The issue presented for review is whether the city court may require a witness to be deposed and to have the testimony memorialized by tape recorder or by other accepted methods for preserving testimony.

The events that preceded this petition for special action are as follows.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. City Ct. of City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. DeddensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. State v. DeRoseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Dean v. City CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Murphy v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA COUNTYArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kanuck v. MeehanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. State ex rel. McDougall v. Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API