Legal Opinion
State v. Deddens
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 24, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2122PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
A discovery order in a pending criminal prosecution is challenged by the State in this special action. Since no remedy by appeal is available and the circumstances warrant appellate intervention, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.
The subject order authorizes defense counsel for Mr. Morales, defendant in a pending criminal case, to depose two witnesses for the prosecution. One witness resides in Douglas, Arizona, and the other resides out-of-state. Lengthy personal interviews with these witnesses were afforded defense counsel in November and December of 1975. (The…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Murphy v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA COUNTYArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PecoraMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Kirkendall v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DeRoseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.