Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McDougall v. Municipal Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 5, 1987No. Nos. 1 CA-CIV 9274, 1 CA-CIV 9469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

When a witness will not “cooperate” in giving a personal interview, rule 15.3, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, authorizes the court, in its discretion, to order the taking of the witness’s oral deposition. The determination of whether a witness is “cooperative” is generally a matter within the discretion of the trial court. After reviewing the three cases before us in this consolidated appeal, we find a proper exercise of discretion concerning one witness and an erroneous exercise of discretion concerning the other two. Each case involves an attempt by defense counsel…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. FullerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Arizona Downs v. Turf Paradise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. State v. Amy Lou HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API