Legal Opinion

Kanuck v. Meehan

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 11, 1990No. 2 CA-SA 90-0128PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Petitioner Keith Richard Kanuck seeks special action relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion for court-ordered depositions in the underlying probation revocation proceeding. Because we conclude that petitioner has no equally plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal and because we believe the trial court abused its discretion, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief. Ariz.R.P.Spec. Action 1 and 3, 17B A.R.S.

In May of 1988, petitioner was sentenced to consecutive terms of seven and four years’ probation for convictions of conspiracy to sell marijuana and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cuciak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TuttleNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. DeBordeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. State of Arizona v. Eddie Brian CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API