Kanuck v. Meehan
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Petitioner Keith Richard Kanuck seeks special action relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion for court-ordered depositions in the underlying probation revocation proceeding. Because we conclude that petitioner has no equally plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal and because we believe the trial court abused its discretion, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief. Ariz.R.P.Spec. Action 1 and 3, 17B A.R.S.
In May of 1988, petitioner was sentenced to consecutive terms of seven and four years’ probation for convictions of conspiracy to sell marijuana and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cuciak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TuttleNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DeBordeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State of Arizona v. Eddie Brian CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007