Legal Opinion
Lever Bros. Co. v. Riodela Chemical Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 4, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2357PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the opposition of appellant and adjudging the appellee entitled to> the registration of the word “Tex” as applied for.
Appellant’s trade-mark is the word “Lux,” registered January 1, 1907, used upon soap and soap powder.
Appellee’s application was filed on March 26, 1925, and was for a composite mark of which the word “Tex” is the dominating feature, used upon washing and cleaning compounds.
No'…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northam Warren Corporation v. Universal Cosmetic Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Luckel, King & Cake Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- Goodall Worsted Co. v. Palm Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- International Silver Co. v. American Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Duro Pump & Mfg. Co. v. Thomas Maddock's Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dan Robbins & Associates v. Questor Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Alexander B. Stewart OrganizationsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.