Legal Opinion
North Associates. v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1986No. A028762PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Robert Y. Bell (Bell) appeals from a postjudgment order determining that respondent North Associates (North) was entitled to attorney’s fees as the prevailing party in its action for unlawful detainer. We affirm.
I
At all relevant times, North was the owner of real property located at 858 Third Street, Santa Rosa. On March 13, 1981, Bell entered into a commercial lease agreement with North for the use and possession of the property. The lease was for a period of six months, commencing on March 15, 1981, and ending September 14, 1981. It contained an option to renew for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Care Construction, Inc. v. Century Convalescent Centers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Jones v. DrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Martin v. Pacific Southwest Royalties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by17 opinions
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Bovard v. American Horse Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Milman v. ShukhatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Beverly Hills Properties v. MarcolinoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.