Legal Opinion
United States v. Ammar
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 19, 1990No. 90-3011PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Neal Roger McFayden appeals from the order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which the court considered as a Motion to Vacate, Correct or Set Aside Sentence relative to the term of special parole.
I
McFayden was convicted in 1981 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania of two counts of conspiracy and three counts of distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to five eight-year terms of imprisonment on these offenses, all terms of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Edward Bontkowski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- David Richard Caille v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. H. Rap BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. John James ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Roger Andrew Talk, A/K/A Roderick TalkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Juan FaulksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Tweedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. TedescoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.