Legal Opinion

State v. Tedesco

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 24, 2013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner

Defendant Giuseppe Tedesco stands convicted of murder and now awaits sentencing — a momentous and solemn part of the criminal justice process. Relying on Rule 3:21 — 4(b), he asserts that he has an absolute, unilateral right to be absent from his sentencing hearing and has filed a written waiver with the court.

We find no support in the court rale or elsewhere for defendant’s position and hold that trial judges have discretion to decide whether to accept a defendant’s waiver. In an attempt to justify a waiver, a defendant must advance specific reasons that demonstrate special circumstances.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. LawlessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  3. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of D.Y. Svp 491-08Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. State of New Jersey v. Wedpens DorsainvilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  5. State of New Jersey v. James GleatonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API