State v. Tedesco
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner
Defendant Giuseppe Tedesco stands convicted of murder and now awaits sentencing — a momentous and solemn part of the criminal justice process. Relying on Rule 3:21 — 4(b), he asserts that he has an absolute, unilateral right to be absent from his sentencing hearing and has filed a written waiver with the court.
We find no support in the court rale or elsewhere for defendant’s position and hold that trial judges have discretion to decide whether to accept a defendant’s waiver. In an attempt to justify a waiver, a defendant must advance specific reasons that demonstrate special circumstances.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. LawlessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of D.Y. Svp 491-08Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- State of New Jersey v. Wedpens DorsainvilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- State of New Jersey v. James GleatonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.