Legal Opinion

Weigel v. Powers Elevator Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

Rronson, Oh. J.

This appeal involves a practice question. The action is for the conversion of grain. ' On February 11th, 1922, judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor pursuant to a verdict. In May, 1922, defendant made a motion for judgment non obstante or, in tbe *777alternative, for a new trial, on the grounds of error in law occurring at the trial and of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The trial court denied this motion. Then, in May, 1922, the defendant appealed from the judgment and from the order denying such motion with proper bond staying proceedings.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Skaar v. EppelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Moore v. BookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mosher v. MosherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Higgins v. RuedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. McKenzie v. Bismarck Water Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hermes v. MarkhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. C. & M., INC. v. Northern Founders Insurance Co. of NDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Zimmerman v. KitzanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API