Higgins v. Rued
North Dakota Supreme Court
From an order of the District Court of Stutsman County denying a motion for new trial, Coffey, J., defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
This action was tried in the district court of Stutsman county and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment was entered pursuant to the verdict on June 26th, 1914, and notice of entry of such judgment was served upon the attorneys for the defendant on July J, 1914. No appeal was taken therefrom, but on January 29, 1915, the defendant’s attorneys served upon the attorneys for the plaintiff a notice of motion for a new trial. The motion came on for hearing pursuant to such notice on February 10, 1915 ; and at that time the plaintiff’s attorneys filed written objections to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Butts v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Canning v. FriedMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- McKenzie v. Bismarck Water Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Grove v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Peterson v. LundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Skaar v. EppelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Haser v. PapeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Bratberg v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Garbush v. FireyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Goodman v. MevorahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.