Zimmerman v. Kitzan
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Upon a former appeal in this case, 77 N.D. 477, 43 N.W.2d 822, we affirmed an order of the district court granting a new trial. In proceedings in district court after remand, the attorney for defendants moved the court to- vacate the order which this court had affirmed. The district court granted the motion and entered an order vacating .the order granting a new trial. This appeal is from that order.
There is no question but that the order appealed from was beyond the power of the district court. In effect the vacation of an order affirmed by this court is a vacation óf an order of this count.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zimmerman v. KitzanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Colter v. DillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Walker v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Weigel v. Powers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zimmerman v. KitzanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954